![\"Summary](\"http:\/\/media.premiumtimesng.com\/wp-content\/files\/2015\/12\/501x768xSummary-of-Malabus-history-354x349.png.pagespeed.ic.JjUmG-oIZs.png\")
<\/p>\nThe Nigerian government is set to retrieve one of Africa\u2019s richest oil blocs from oil giants, Shell and Eni, it has been learnt.<\/p>\n
Not only will the two oil giants lose OPL 245, should President Muhammadu Buhari approve the recommendations, they will also be fined billions of dollars for illegal activities, including paying money to fraudulent public officials and private citizens in order to secure the bloc.<\/p>\n
The retrieval of the controversial oil bloc, estimated to contain about 9 billion barrels of crude, as well as placing heavy fines on the oil giants, is contained in a far-reaching recommendation by the office of the Director of Public Prosecution, DPP, Mohammed Diri.<\/p>\n
The recommendation was at the instance of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, who is set to advise the federal government on how to proceed on a controversial deal that is being investigated by authorities in four different countries.<\/p>\n
In arriving at its recommendations, the DPP committee, which included lawyers from his office, called for the cancellation of the \u2018settlement agreement\u2019 that ceded the oil bloc to Shell and Eni.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The \u2018Settlement Agreement\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n Made on April 29, 2011, the settlement deal is made up of three different \u2018Resolution agreement\u2019 signed by the parties involved in the OPL 245 saga.<\/p>\n The first, titled \u201cBLOCK 245 MALABU RESOLUTION AGREEMENT\u201d was signed between representatives of the federal government and those of Malabu, which was represented during the discussions by a former petroleum minister, Dan Etete.<\/p>\n The second agreement, titled \u201cBLOCK 245 RESOLUTION AGREEMENT\u201d was between the Nigerian government and officials of Shell and Eni\/AGIP; while the third agreement, titled \u201cBLOCK 245 SNUD RESOLUTION AGREEMENT\u201d, was signed by officials of the Nigerian government and Shell.<\/p>\n The immediate past attorney general of the federation, Mohammed Adoke, and immediate past petroleum minister, Diezani Alison-Madueke signed all the agreements on behalf of the federal government. Both are among officials being investigated by Nigeria\u2019s foremost anti-graft agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, for their roles in the scam.<\/p>\n The agreements saw the transfer of OPL 245, first from the Malabu to the Nigerian government and then from the government to Shell and Eni. The agreements also effectively cancelled all previous law suits and judgements related to the case.<\/p>\n It was based on these agreements that Shell and Eni paid a total of $1.3 billion into Nigerian government accounts, which as stated in earlier reports by PREMIUM TIMES, largely ended up in accounts of phoney companies and shady characters.<\/p>\n Cancel the agreement<\/strong> One of the reasons the panel consider the agreement illegal is that the ex-convict, Mr. Etete, had no legal authority to negotiate the agreement on behalf of Malabu as he was not a shareholder of the company nor had the permission of the shareholders to do so.<\/p>\n Also, the oil bloc was awarded to Malabu in furtherance of Nigeria\u2019s policy to encourage local companies and part of the conditions for the award was that \u201cforeign participation interest in the blocks (OPL 245 and 214) shall not exceed 40%, i.e. 60\/40 indigenous to foreign;\u201d a fact Shell was aware of but chose to ignore.<\/p>\n The committee also sought the cancellation of the agreement based on a resolution by the last House of Representatives, which called for the cancellation and demanded that Shell be\u201ccensured or reprimanded\u2026 for its lack of transparency and full disclosure in its bid to acquire OPL 245.\u201d<\/p>\n Also, although Shell and Eni claimed they only struck an agreement with the federal government and that they did not know, before the agreement, that the money they paid was going to Malabu, evidence by investigators in Italy and the Nigerian anti-graft agency, EFCC, shows that the oil firms knew the payment was eventually going to Malabu accounts controlled by Mr. Etete, a man once convicted for money laundering in France.<\/p>\n Apart from calling for the cancellation of the agreement, the DPP panel also recommended the full recovery of the money paid by Shell and Eni, describing it as \u201cproceed of crime.<\/p>\n In refusing the to release the money, the judge questioned the actions of the Goodluck Jonathan presidency on the OPL 245 saga saying \u201cI cannot simply assume that the FGN which was in power in 2011 and subsequently until 2015 rigorously defended the public interest of the people of Nigeria in all respects.\u201d<\/p>\n Apart from recommending the withdrawal of the OPL 245 from Shell and Eni and calling for the retrieval of the money, the panel also asked the federal government to collaborate with all foreign agencies investigating the deal as well as prosecute all individuals and firms that violated local and international laws in the process.<\/p>\n In its recommendation, the panel also stated that the Federal Government can make \u201cclose to $10 billion\u201d from the scandal.<\/p>\n Making money for Nigeria<\/strong> This, the panel stated, should be done \u201cin accordance with the relevant provisions of our laws in conformity with international best practices via the appropriate courts (at) home or abroad as the case may be.\u201d<\/p>\n In other words, from the fine and the amount to be retrieved of the $1.3 billion, the government could make about $8 billion.<\/p>\n Also, in asking that the oil bloc be returned to Malabu\u2019s original owners, the panel asked that the necessary licensing fees, transfer fees, signature bonus, and tax be paid by the firm; while 50 per cent of the rights to the bloc should return to Nigeria after three years based on original intent of awarding the bloc.<\/p>\n PREMIUM TIMES had reported how Malabu was awarded the oil block in 1998 with its shareholders being Mohammed Abacha, son of late military dictator, Sani Abacha, (50 per cent); Kweku Amafegha (the fictional character created by Mr. Etete, 30 per cent); and Wabi Hassan (wife of Hassan Adamu, former Nigerian ambassador to the U.S. 20%).<\/p>\n Human rights lawyer, Jiti Ogunye, had argued that the oil bloc ought to return to Nigeria and Malabu\u2019s registration cancelled since it was based on falsehood.<\/p>\n \u201cSection 190 and Section 436 (b) of the Criminal Code Act is applicable to the conduct of the promoter of Malabu, in that a false representation or declaration was made to induce the Corporate Affairs Commission to issue an incorporation certificate,\u201d Mr. Ogunye said.<\/p>\n \u201cOwing to the false representation, the Corporate Affairs Commission can approach the Federal High Court under Section 563 of CAMA to seek the withdrawal and cancellation of the Certificate of Incorporation of Malabu.\u201d<\/p>\n Awaiting Malami, Buhari<\/strong> The report is to be sent this week to both the Solicitor General of the Federation, Taiwo Abidogun, and Mr. Malami, with the latter expected to advise President Buhari on the next steps based on the recommendations.<\/p>\n A source at the presidency mentioned that the president was keenly following the matter and recently received a report on it from the office of the Vice President, who is coordinating the actions of the AGF, EFCC and Petroleum ministry on the matter.<\/p>\n Both the DPP and the Attorney General, in separate phone interviews, confirmed their offices were working on resolving the OPL 245 issue, but would not comment on the details.<\/p>\n \u201cMalabu is a very sensitive issue and if there\u2019s any resolution, I will have to get clearance before I can speak to the press on it,\u201d the DPP, Mr. Diri, said.<\/p>\n Also, it was learnt that Shell was already aware of the government\u2019s moves to cancel the agreement, and was lobbying against it.<\/p>\n However, the oil giant\u2019s spokesperson, Precious Okolobo, declined comments on the matter.<\/p>\n <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The committee empanelled by the Attorney General Malami recommended that the agreement be cancelled, describing it as \u201cnull and void\u201d, and saying it \u201cshould not be given any legal effect by the FGN (Federal Government of Nigeria) as doing so would amount to the FGN condoning and perpetuating illegality.\u201d<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
![\"Infographic---Malabu\"](\"http:\/\/media.premiumtimesng.com\/wp-content\/files\/2015\/12\/501x768xInfographic-Malabu.jpg.pagespeed.ic.wFwk7XesvJ.webp\")
<\/p>\n
To make the money, the panel recommended that Shell and Eni be fined at least $6.5 billion (five times the $1.3 billion Shell and Eni originally paid in 2011 the block).<\/p>\n
The DPP report was to be sent to the Attorney General last week, a source at his office revealed, but was delayed due to Mr. Malami\u2019s trip with President Muhammadu Buhari to the United Arab Emirates.<\/p>\n